There is now a minority report to this letter.

Dear Ministers and Elders,
May 1st, 2012

Prior to the June 2012 meeting of the General Synod, I wanted to follow up regarding my previous note. Earlier I had communicated the Erskine Board of Trustees’ response to the 2011 Synod motions regarding the removal of trustees from the Erskine Board.

David Conner has given a presentation on these motions to the Board of Trustees (at its February 2012 meeting) and to various other groups since that time, including the Executive Board of General Synod. The presentation contains some of the numerous materials that are cited in the Board’s response to General Synod. The requirements of the accrediting agencies were more stringent than many of us anticipated and the materials demonstrate the constraints which shaped the Board’s decision.

In the interest of transparency, I have included materials in the presentation that explain the Board’s position.  These materials have proven very helpful for increased understanding of the Board’s response. Thus, I wanted to share them with each of you and with all of those attending Synod 2012. My hope is that you will be able to better understand the extensive documentation that was studied by the ad hoc committee in the preparation of its report that was adopted by the Board.

Here is a link to a website that will take you to the supporting materials:

http://www.erskine.edu/response/

Thank you for your time and effort to understand these important issues that we believe will allow for greater understanding and mutual support of the very important relationship between the ARP Church and Erskine.

In Christ,
Joe Patrick
Chair, Erskine Board of Trustees

Erskine trustees’ response to requests from the ARP General Synod

Text of the Response:

Erskine Board of Trustees Response to 2011 General Synods Requests

Supporting Documents:

• Erskine_Bylaws-signed May 20 2011
• EC — 1850 & 1872 Charter documents
• EC — 1973 Charter Amendment
• EC — 1977 Charter Amendment and Restatement
• EC — 1980 Charter Amendment
• ARPC — General Synod Minutes 1972
• ARPC — General Synod Minutes 1978
• EC — Statement of Trustee Responsibilities 1986
• EC — Trustee Profile 1990
• ARPC — Statement of Philosophy of Christian Higher Education 1977 & 78
• ARPC — Report of Special Committee 1977
• SACS — Principles of Accreditation 2010
• ATS Standards of Accreditation
• ATS 8.3.1.1
• Director, Accreditation and Institutional Evaluation (ATS) 12-21-11 e-mail

More posts in this category

• Erskine President David Norman is Forced Out “I am exhausted.” The toll this job has taken on me and on my family cannot be ignored. I also know that, although I have committed each day to serve God and this ...
• Separation of Church and School — by World Magazine by Mickey McLean at World Magazine The struggle over the governance of Erskine College and Seminary continues The ongoing battle between the board of trustees of Erskine College and Erskine Seminary and their founding denomination, the ...
• Minority Report of Erskine Trustees Regarding the Erskine Board’s Response to the General Synod
• Louisiana College Wins Legal Battle for Inerrancy — Lessons for the ARP Maybe? Liberal professors “candidly testified administration.” The professors filed suit in 2005 against the ...

• Do Rocks and Fossils Take a Long Time to Form? From grade school to college, we are taught that rocks and fossils take a very long time to form and that they are proof that the earth in hundreds of millions of ...
• Why Does the Apostle’s Creed Think Pontius Pilate is Central to our Faith? — Luke 1:1-4 When the early church pieced together the Apostle’s Creed, they were using the baptismal formulas previously in use by the actual Apostles. We don’t know which Apostle coined each phrase of the ...
• Louisiana College Wins Legal Battle for Inerrancy — Lessons for the ARP Maybe? Liberal professors “candidly testified administration.” The professors filed suit in 2005 against the ...
• Should We Still Believe in a Historical Adam?
• “All Mankind, Descending from Adam” . . . Is It a Necessary WCF Doctrine? by Richard B. Gaffin, Jr. Every Christian who is truly submitted to the Bible’s authority needs to be alert to this recent development [i.e., that the descent of all human beings from Adam ...