Louisiana College Wins Legal Battle for Inerrancy — Lessons for the ARP Maybe?
Leigh Jones
Louisiana College trustees and administrators at the end of March won what could be the last battle in a long war over the school’s adherence to its biblical foundation.
On March 28, a Louisiana district court judge dismissed a suit brought against the school by four professors who claimed defamation and infliction of emotional distress in a disagreement with school leaders over the inerrancy of scripture.
In what school administrators have billed a landmark decision upholding religious liberty on campus, Judge Mary Doggett ruled that because the disagreement centered on theology, secular courts had no jurisdiction in the matter.
“Under the Establishment Clause, the consideration is whether the issues which the Court will have to resolve will necessarily turn upon competing interpretations of religion, thus resulting in the court becoming ‘entangled’ in an ecclesiastical dispute,” Doggett wrote, referencing the First Amendment. “The ‘Entanglement Doctrine’ provides that a court must decline jurisdiction over a lawsuit when the dispute is so intertwined with matters of religion that a proper resolution cannot be made without interpreting or choosing between competing religious principles or doctrines.”
The case brought by the four professors-Carlton Winbery, Frederick Downing, James Heath and Connie Douglas-clearly arose out of a theological dispute, Doggett concluded.
During depositions, the professors “candidly testified that their errant view of the Bible was in conflict with the inerrant beliefs of the [school] administration,” according to Doggett’s ruling.
The professors filed suit in 2005 against the school amid a growing furor over the school’s movement away from Baptist doctrine. The professors fueled the controversy with statements they made during class, including voicing skepticism over the bodily resurrection of Jesus and Mary’s virginity, school President Joe Aguillard said.
In response to complaints from parents and students about how liberal the small college in Pineville, La., had become, the Louisiana Baptist Convention appointed a new slate of conservative trustees to oversee operations, Aguillard said: “Their goal was to bring the college back to its biblical roots.”
When several faculty members recommended using M. Scott Peck’s “The Road Less Traveled” as the cornerstone text in a course on Christian values, Aguillard and other administrators baulked. The school’s academic freedom policy allowed the book to be used in the course, as long as the professors told students it was written based on Buddhist principles. Any teaching about the book also had to include a juxtaposition of Christian values against the values set forth in the book.
As soon as Aguillard denied the professors’ request to use the book as a cornerstone text, they filed suit.
The resulting court battle, which dragged on for almost seven years, was not the first time a Louisiana court was asked to weigh in on the fight over the theological direction of Louisiana College. When the Board of Trustees in late 2004 promoted Aguillard, then a faculty member, to the school’s top job, a group of donors and alumni concerned about his conservative views filed suit. The state’s Supreme Court ruled in favor of the school.
Before the latest case reached court, all four professors retired. While the school won the case in district court, the professors could appeal.
Although the infighting over the school raged for about four years, starting in 2003, disagreements over the school’s stand on the inerrancy of scripture are pretty much over now, Aguillard said. During the last five years, enrollment has grown by 89 percent. The school is building more dormitories and hiring more teachers for its 1,600 students. It just opened a School of Divinity, and next year, Louisiana College will welcome its first class of law students.
Aguillard attributed the school’s recent growth to its willingness to stand up for biblical truth: “God’s Word is true, and Louisiana College will never move from its position on biblical inerrancy, regardless of attacks from any and all directions.”
More posts in this category
Erskine College
- Erskine President David Norman is Forced Out “I am exhausted.” The toll this job has taken on me and on my family cannot be ignored. I also know that, although I have committed each day to serve God and this ...
- Separation of Church and School — by World Magazine by Mickey McLean at World Magazine The struggle over the governance of Erskine College and Seminary continues The ongoing battle between the board of trustees of Erskine College and Erskine Seminary and their founding denomination, the ...
- Minority Report of Erskine Trustees Regarding the Erskine Board’s Response to the General Synod
- A message from Erskine Board of Trustees Chair Joe Patrick Dear Ministers and Elders, Prior to the June 2012 meeting of the General Synod, I wanted to follow up regarding my previous note. Earlier I had communicated the Erskine Board of Trustees’ response to the ...
Inerrancy
- Do Rocks and Fossils Take a Long Time to Form? From grade school to college, we are taught that rocks and fossils take a very long time to form and that they are proof that the earth in hundreds of millions of ...
- Why Does the Apostle’s Creed Think Pontius Pilate is Central to our Faith? — Luke 1:1-4 When the early church pieced together the Apostle’s Creed, they were using the baptismal formulas previously in use by the actual Apostles. We don’t know which Apostle coined each phrase of the ...
- Should We Still Believe in a Historical Adam?
- “All Mankind, Descending from Adam” . . . Is It a Necessary WCF Doctrine? by Richard B. Gaffin, Jr. Every Christian who is truly submitted to the Bible’s authority needs to be alert to this recent development [i.e., that the descent of all human beings from Adam ...
- The Six Day Creation Debate Just Heating Up in the PCA The Progression of the PCA Creation Debate — Told with 6 Recent News Stories What Does The Westminster Confession Mean By ‘In The Space of Six Days’by R. C. Sproul “…In the beginning, to ...





We need the energy to finish what God tells us to start!
2 Kings 13:15-19 Elisha told Joash, “Get a bow and some arrows.” So he brought Elisha a bow and some arrows. 16 Elisha then said to Israel’s king, “Put your hand on the bow.” So Joash put his hand on the bow. Elisha then put his hands over the king’s hands 17 and said, “Open the window to the east.” The king did so. “Now shoot!” Elisha told him. Joash shot, then Elisha announced, “That’s the Lord’s rescue arrow! The rescue arrow against the Arameans! You will finish the Arameans off at Aphek.” 18 Then Elisha said, “Take the arrows!” so Joash took them. Elisha then said to Israel’s king, “Hit the ground with them!” Joash hit the ground three times and stopped. 19 The man of God became angry with him. He said, “If only you had struck five or six times, you would have finished the Arameans off. As it is, you will defeat them only three times.”
It’s all about your passion and willingness to follow through.
The pop-culture says that you have to be “In it to win it!” We just stood there — indignant that the secular courts had a right to rule on our decision.
The ARP Synod failed to embrace the (Rom 13) God ordained civil powers over the law, which had the authority to add a legal mandate to our Bible mandate. We REALLY needed to win the case! But, we just stood there . . . shocked.
Why did the courts have this authority? Because Synod asked the courts to have this authority when we set non-profit law as a guide between Erskine & Synod. We asked the State to make them an independent 501 C3. That was Synod’s doing.
Being in the courts was disappointing, but not being in it to win it was a more serious mistake.
If you want to comment, but don’t want a paid membership, Click Here